In workforce development, we assume other
people’s problems as our own. People that do not have jobs are our problem. If
there are not enough jobs or the right jobs, it is our problem. As an industry, we look at the problems of the
individual and the problems of society and work to solve them through
employment and training options. The focus is centered on the needs of the
client- whether it is the job seeker, the employer, or our funder. In our
process of trying to solve problems of others, we neglect the big elephant in
the room that is preventing us from actually achieving our mission.
The industry is on the verge of a shift. The change is that in the Workforce Innovation and Opportunities Act, WIOA, we will be required to work harder than we ever have before to find employment for people with multiple barriers. These barriers will not be easily solved with a bus map and a stack of bus tokens, but will instead require us to look at the whole person. We may need to call upon our partners for assistance and work as a team to get the job seeker to employment.
Some of the job seekers that seek job seeking services will have difficulties with learning. They may have learning disabilities that are undiagnosed. In order to effectively service these job seekers, they need to know if they have a learning disability and how to work with it. Investing in services to diagnose learning disabilities, so that job seekers can receive accommodations under the Americans with Disabilities Act, the ADA while receiving job seeking services and during employment will lead to greater success increased outcomes for programs and employment retention for job seekers.
Finally, if there is one thing that that can help people learn is to think of learning in program design. If job seeking programs are built upon a set of public and/or private funding, then the individuals that make decisions on funding need to think about how people learn. Program designers need to think about learning for the best outcome. Learning does not happen from the bottom up. Like many other things, a learning culture is top down.
I welcome ideas and comments below. Tell me what you learned. If you didn’t, tell me also. I am available by email also at kcirincione@gmail.com. ~ Karen Cirincione
The industry is on the verge of a shift. The change is that in the Workforce Innovation and Opportunities Act, WIOA, we will be required to work harder than we ever have before to find employment for people with multiple barriers. These barriers will not be easily solved with a bus map and a stack of bus tokens, but will instead require us to look at the whole person. We may need to call upon our partners for assistance and work as a team to get the job seeker to employment.
Additionally, we may need to look at how
we work with job seekers. The job seekers need to get a job as a result of the
stuff that we do. How do we know when we work with a job seeker, both individually
and in a group, the job seekers is learning? The big white elephant is a job
seeker’s ability to learn. If a person is not learning, they are not able to
take the next step, applying the lessons. The success of any program that works
with job seekers, is the ability of the person to learn any apply the lessons
learned.
I am recommending that as an industry, we
not only apply the best practices from the experts in workforce development and
economic development to get our people employed, but also some of the lessons
from the experts in education. My first
recommendation is as part of the assessment of a job seeker to assess a person’s
learning style. Secondly, the job seeker
should be presented with information to aid him in his job search based on his
learning style. Accommodating a job seeker’s natural learning style will not
only allow the job seeker to learn and therefore apply the job seeking skills
learned. Helping people understand how
they learn will help them make better career choices. This is how learning
styles is part of the career counseling process.
I would also like to recommend that anyone
that conducts workshops for job seekers rethink the workshop. It doesn’t matter
the title- workshop, seminar, class. If the method doesn’t work, it is the opposite
of a workshop. It is a “brokenshop”. One of the reasons is that the instructors
are talking to themselves. If the job seekers enrolled in these group sessions
do not learn well in a classroom setting where people are talking at them- referring
to their PowerPoints along the way, then it is useless. What is the point of a
workshop or seminar if the attendees do not learn anything? I would recommend
that workshops are developed by people with backgrounds in curriculum development
and facilitators are trained like teachers.
Each job seeking workshop should have a pre and post test to measure if
anyone has learned anything.
Some of the job seekers that seek job seeking services will have difficulties with learning. They may have learning disabilities that are undiagnosed. In order to effectively service these job seekers, they need to know if they have a learning disability and how to work with it. Investing in services to diagnose learning disabilities, so that job seekers can receive accommodations under the Americans with Disabilities Act, the ADA while receiving job seeking services and during employment will lead to greater success increased outcomes for programs and employment retention for job seekers.
For those that work in a one-stop career
center setting. It is time to stop thinking of a one-stop as library where
people flutter from experience to experience learning about different things
along the way. A One-Stop Career Center is really a school. Job seekers learn about job seeking and the
labor market. Employers learn about the
candidates and how to grow their workforce.
Thinking of the One-Stop Career Center in this method means that the infrastructure
needs to be developed in a way for the best learning. Is the layout conductive
to a learning atmosphere? Does it have the necessary technology and materials
to aid in learning?
Finally, if there is one thing that that can help people learn is to think of learning in program design. If job seeking programs are built upon a set of public and/or private funding, then the individuals that make decisions on funding need to think about how people learn. Program designers need to think about learning for the best outcome. Learning does not happen from the bottom up. Like many other things, a learning culture is top down.
Readers, please do not confuse me with an
educational expert. I am a front line worker. I have years of experience with
job seekers in different professions, educational levels, and career
success. What I have noticed is
throughout my years is that there are some job seekers that never seem to make
it to career success. Many of the job seekers have been in the job seeking
programs for many years, repeating information over and over again, never being
able to get over the hump to career success. It is time for the workforce
development industry to learn and grow. It is time to really analyze why some
people are quickly successful and others are not.
I welcome ideas and comments below. Tell me what you learned. If you didn’t, tell me also. I am available by email also at kcirincione@gmail.com. ~ Karen Cirincione
Comments
Post a Comment